After my most recent visit to the Brookline Preservation Commission, I was able to fill in a significant amount of information regarding additions and subtractions. However, as I was sifting through all the gathered info, I found a much more interesting piece of the Anderson estate story coming to light. The time between the town receiving the land (1949) and present day park was quite the rollercoaster of preservation & demolition, both literally and figuratively.
In the 1940's, just as the town was receiving the Anderson's land, the outdoor recreation craze was sweeping the nation. Providing public amenities to residents was all the rage and, just being gifting a massive amount of land, the Brookline Park department, as well as the city, was eager to turn it into a recreation haven.
The first major blow to the park was the loss of the mansion in 1959. “The town must have seen the mansion at the top of the hill as nothing more than an extravagant white elephant.” -Mary Dewart
1960s: City hired planning firm (Everett & Untermann) to develop long range plan for park
Skating rink built on site of Italian Gardens
Many other park assets vandalized and destroyed
1985: Listed Park and variety of assets on National Register
1988: “Larz Anderson can become a showplace, an example of the integration of a town and citizen, historical and recreational needs. In the past, things have been done expeditiously, and done badly. Let’s take a deep breath, look around, and do a better job than we’ve done in the past”. Michael Berger, Greenspace Alliance president
December 1988: $1 million in renewal funds made available to park…still not enough to cover cost of restoring/maintaining entire park
1989: Preservation projects finally began and stone, masonry, and landscaping began around pond, temple, and bridges
June 23, 1990 (or 91?): Park officially opens (again) to town
My interest in the field of preservation has always leaned more towards the preservation process of a place and less towards the history of a place, (of course I do love the history portion though!) So of course reading the articles, op-eds, and documentation on the process of saving the estate from further distortion was extremely interesting. If it wasn't so late in the game, I would focus my independent study more on the history of the preservation process of the park. But I guess what I'm doing with it now is furthering the story of the preservation of it in some way...
We shouldn't have to move so far away from moments in our built history to appreciate their significance.






